ESP Journal of Engineering & Technology Advancements |
© 2021 by ESP JETA |
Volume 1 Issue 2 |
Year of Publication : 2021 |
Authors : Pavan Kumar Joshi |
: 10.56472/25832646/ESP-V1I2P118 |
Pavan Kumar Joshi , 2021. "CI/CD Automation for Payment Gateways: Azure vs. AWS", ESP Journal of Engineering & Technology Advancements, 1(2): 163-175.
The payment industry has evolved a lot in the tech aspect. Free-For-All features a CI/CD culture because of cloud-computing integration intended to improve the CI/CD pipeline for payment gateways. Two cloud platforms, Azure and AWS, provide rich CI/CD services that include numerous automation tools, which enable payment gateways to provide high availability, security, and scalability. This paper considers the Azure and AWS CI/CD solutions for the automated deployment of payment gateways. One of the issues that contribute to the decision is the integration of tools, security, deployment options, and cost. A comparison is made between Azure Pipelines and AWS CodePipeline, and some recommendations for formulating the payment gateway automation are provided to meet compliance, security, and operational excellence needs. Lastly, we will give the advantages and disadvantages of the respective platforms and explain how to construct a single strategy for CI/CD for payment gateways.
[1] Saarenpää, J. (2020). Creating an Azure CI/CD pipeline for a React web application.
[2] Stefanovic, V., & Katinski, M. (2021). Pro Azure Administration and Automation. Apress.
[3] Galiveeti, S., Tawalbeh, L. A., Tawalbeh, M., & El-Latif, A. A. A. (2021). Cybersecurity analysis: Investigating the data integrity and privacy in AWS and Azure cloud platforms. In Artificial intelligence and blockchain for future cybersecurity applications (pp. 329-360). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[4] Kaushik, P., Rao, A. M., Singh, D. P., Vashisht, S., & Gupta, S. (2021, November). Cloud computing and comparison based on service and performance between Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. In 2021 International Conference on Technological Advancements and Innovations (ICTAI) (pp. 268-273). IEEE.
[5] Saraswat, M., & Tripathi, R. C. (2020, December). Cloud computing: Comparison and analysis of cloud service providers-AWs, Microsoft and Google. In 2020 9th International Conference System Modeling and Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) (pp. 281-285). IEEE.
[6] Zampetti, F., Geremia, S., Bavota, G., & Di Penta, M. (2021, September). CI/CD pipelines evolution and restructuring: A qualitative and quantitative study. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME) (pp. 471-482). IEEE.
[7] Gupta, B., Mittal, P., & Mufti, T. (2021, March). A review on Amazon web service (AWS), Microsoft Azure & and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on ICT for Digital, Smart, and Sustainable Development, ICIDSSD 2020, 27-28 February 2020, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
[8] Kamal, M. A., Raza, H. W., Alam, M. M., & Mohd, M. (2020). Highlight the features of AWS, GCP and Microsoft Azure that have an impact when choosing a cloud service provider. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng, 8(5), 4124-4232.
[9] Ucuz, D. (2020, June). Comparison of the IoT platform vendors, Microsoft Azure, Amazon web services, and Google Cloud, from users’ perspectives. In 2020 8th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
[10] DevOps Automation in AWS and Azure: Differences and benefits, Aspire Systems, online. https://blog.aspiresys.com/infrastructure-managed-services/devops-automation-in-aws-and-azure-differences-and-benefits/
[11] Arachchi, S. A. I. B. S., & Perera, I. (2018, May). Continuous integration and continuous delivery pipeline automation for agile software project management. In 2018 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon) (pp. 156-161). IEEE.
CI/CD, Azure Pipelines, AWS CodePipeline, Payment Gateways, Automation, Continuous Integration.