Reviewer Guidelines
Review is a rigorous and time-consuming process that is advantageous to the community as well as the reviewer. In addition to assessing an article submission and producing a review report, the reviewer's duties also include ensuring the journal's quality by pointing out flawed research.
Reviewers thus contribute significantly to scientific advancement and offer a vital service to the entire scientific community. Giving a portion of one's time to review a scientific paper is a kind gesture because reviewers typically do this role without compensation. In contrast, the reviewer is typically a researcher who gains by having his work evaluated when it is submitted to a scientific publication. Additionally, it is a sign of respect from knowledgeable peers to be selected as a reviewer by the editor of a prominent scientific publication.
All of the reviewers are honoured by ESP JETA for their unwavering assistance in evaluating manuscripts and promoting our publication to different researchers and research forums. In addition to our requirements, ESP JETA reviewers have many duties.
- 1. Once you receive the article for review, kindly ensure that the research work is relevant to your area of expertise.
- 2. Ensure with the time period for review, ESP JETA has a great responsibility to reply to the authors on time.
- 3. Kindly respond to the review request as soon as possible, even it may require acceptance for the review request or decline the request so that we can allocate the progress for some other reviewers without a minimum delay.
- 4. Kindly handle the articles and supportive documents as confidential documents.
- 5. We request you do not share the review information with anyone without Editor in Chief's or Managing Editor's Approval.
- 6. The Model formal review report can be downloaded from the bottom of this page. Reviewers are requested to use the report format to review the articles.
- 7. If you have come to the decision of rejection, you have to furnish what kind of major flaws you found in the article.
- 8. Be sure that experimental analysis, results and conclusions, supportive documents such as pics, datasets, graphs, samples were placed in a proper manner.
- 9. Kindly check with the references that have been mentioned properly and use the journal preferred format.
- 10. Try to complete the review within the deadline.